Thursday, June 23, 2011

JPMorgan flexes muscle with European hedge funds

Wed Jun 22, 2011 5:12pm EDT

* JPMorgan rolls out prime broker services in Europe

* Plans to bring in as many as 15 clients this year

* Has an eye on Asia as well

By Svea Herbst-Bayliss

BOSTON, June 22 (Reuters) - JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N) took a big step in expanding its footprint in the global prime brokerage business on Wednesday by launching complete prime services for European hedge funds.

Since the financial crisis three years ago when hedge funds began reevaluating relationships with prime brokers, JPMorgan Chase has worked hard to build its business in this lucrative but crowded field.

Thanks to its brand and ability to lend money and stocks to large hedge funds, JPMorgan is now generally ranked in industry league tables as one of the biggest prime brokers, along with long-time leaders Morgan Stanley (MS.N) and Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS.N).

But industry analysts say the company still has a way to go before it is truly global in an industry that generated roughly $10 billion in revenue in 2010 and is poised to grow.

In the first quarter of 2011 alone, some 254 new hedge funds opened for business at a time when pension funds and endowments are sending billions in new money into these funds.

In Europe, JPMorgan hopes to add between 10 and 15 new clients this year, Lou Lebedin, co-head of the bank's prime brokerage business said in an interview.

"We are bringing clients on in a disciplined pace," he said, noting the bank already deals with managers who oversee about 70 percent of the hedge fund industry's $2 trillion in assets.

But even as the industry grows, the field of prime brokers is becoming more crowded with new players all promising a host of services from clearing trades, to delivering industry research, to making introductions to wealthy investors.

"It is increasingly hard for one top prime broker to differentiate itself from the others because most offer a full range of services and most operate across asset classes," said John Feng, managing director at research firm Greenwich Associates. "In a way, the difference is going to be in the degree of excellence."

For JPMorgan, which entered the business in earnest after it bought Bear Stearns' U.S. prime brokerage operation in 2008, one often cited weakness has been Asia, where it has historically not had a big presence, industry analysts said.

While JPMorgan does not break out its numbers, industry magazine AR has calculated it services $93.3 billion in assets, a 10 percent increase from the previous year, which makes it the prime broker with the most hedge fund assets.

However, with nearly three quarters of its prime broking business in the United States, JPMorgan has made no secret about plans to expand its business in Europe and Asia.

"Up until this point we've been primarily focused on building out a leading platform in Europe," Lebedin said. "As we continue to build out globally, we're now focusing on providing a more robust prime brokerage offering to clients in Asia." (Reporting by Svea Herbst-Bayliss; editing by Andre Grenon)

New Dow Jones Credit Suisse Hedge Fund Index Commentary Offers Insight Into May Hedge Fund Performance

NEW YORKJune 23, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- A new Dow Jones Credit Suisse Hedge Fund Indexmonthly commentary offers insight into May hedge fund performance. Some key findings from the report include:
  • The Dow Jones Credit Suisse Hedge Fund Index posted negative performance in May, finishing down -0.96%, with three out of ten strategies posting positive performance for the month.


  • Dedicated Short Bias was the best performing sector in May. The strategy gained 2.20% as managers capitalized on negative momentum across the equity space.


  • Long/Short Equity funds posted negative performance of -1.68% for the month, but still outperformed long-only benchmarks on both a relative and net exposure-adjusted basis.


  • Managed Futures reversed from its positive performance in April when it posted a gain of 5.40% and fell in May posting a loss of -4.44% after a pullback in commodities.


Industry commentaries and publications are available on the Research section of our website, www.hedgeindex.com. Clickhere to view the full report which includes an overview of May hedge fund performance, in-depth commentary on individual hedge fund sectors and hedge fund return dispersion statistics for each strategy.
SOURCE Credit Suisse AG
RELATED LINKS

Paulson's headache: Too much attention


John Paulson and other superstar hedge fund managers can’t seem to catch a break these days. Mr. Paulson attracted a lot of attention this week when regulatory filings showed that he had ditched his entire stake in Sino-Forest Corp., taking a reported $500-million (U.S.) hit on his investment.
And that loss drew attention to the poor performance of some of his funds this year, in part because of badly timed bets on Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp., both of which have fallen sharply in 2011.
The Wall Street Journal did a nice round-up of some of Mr. Paulson’s recent struggles on Thursday, noting that his Advantage Plus Fund has fallen about 15 per cent so far this month, through June 17. That put the fund down nearly 21 per cent for the year, even as the S&P 500 was up 1.2 per cent in 2011, as of Thursday.
With gold – and gold stocks – down on Thursday, even Mr. Paulson’s influential bet on bullion is being called into question. One of his biggest gold-related bets is on producer AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. (AU-N41.46-1.21-2.84%), whose American Depositary Receipts were down 5.4 per cent on Thursday. And let’s not forget that Mr. Paulson is the biggest investor in the SPDR Gold (GLD-N148.34-2.65-1.76%) exchange traded fund, which tracks the price of bullion. The units were down 2.2 per cent as the price of gold fell.
The longer-term picture looks just as bleak. Mr. Paulson is also a big investor in Gold Fields Ltd. (GFI-N14.10-0.44-3.03%) and Centerra Gold Inc. (CG-T16.120.191.19%), whose shares have tumbled 24.5 per cent and 18.4 per cent, respectively, this year.
The Economist (via Abnormal Returns) gets in on the hedge-fund bashing, too, but widened its scope beyond Mr. Paulson. “The superheroes of finance seem to have lost some of their powers,” the article begins. “Several of the hedge-fund industry’s most exalted names are beset by problems more associated with mere mortals.”
Paulson made the list for his performance stumbles. But the European fund Ikos also figured highly for the marital split between its founders. So do Philip Falcone and Steve Cohen for their tangles with the Securities and Exchange Commission and resulting terrible press coverage. (Neither fund manager has been charged with any wrongdoing.)
“What can be learned from the plight of all these stars?” The Economist asks.
“One lesson is that being famous can have its disadvantages, particularly in the hedge-fund world. As Mr. Paulson can attest, it’s harder to be nimble and to maintain high standards of performance with tens of billions of dollars under management. Funds also risk attracting greater attention from regulators when they become more high-profile. Officials are clearly on the hunt for big fish.”

New Rules for Hedge Fund Adviser Registration Adopted — States to Assume More Responsibility

Jun. 23 2011 - 1:11 pm 
Yesterday, the SEC finalized rules requiring registration of most hedge fund investment advisers with either their state or the SEC.  As mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act, a gaping regulatory hole has now been filled.
Whereas under prior rules, most hedge fund advisers could avoid registration, all but the very smallest advisers will now be subject to regulatory scrutiny.  The new registration regime calls for hedge funds to establish a basic compliance program, make more public disclosure of critical items of importance to investors (such as conflicts of interest, key service providers, custody matters), as well as being subjected to the possibility of examination by regulators.
The attempt to require registration of hedge fund advisers failed before, when in 2006 the DC Circuit Court overturned a similar registration requirement in a case brought by hedge fund adviser, Phil Goldstein.  Rescinded basically on a technicality, the decision allowed the majority of hedge fund advisers to avoid registration for the ensuing 5 years, until the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act.  The new requirement, which goes into effect in March, 2012, closes this gap. There has been little on-the-record resistance to the new requirements by hedge funds.
In crafting the new rules, the federal government believes it has left a substantial portion of this registration burden to the states, as it has effectively raised the “assets under management” minimum for registration with the SEC (to over $100m in most cases), and left the smaller (over $25m, but under $100m) to the states.  The SEC believes that as a result of the new rules, about 3,200 of its current 11,500 registered advisers will switch from registration with the SEC to registration with the states.  What is left unknown is whether 3,200 or more new registrants will take their place, and, perhaps more importantly, whether the SEC actually has the muscle to oversee and examine these charges.  Also left unknown is the extent to which the states themselves can handle an influx of registrants.
With the March 2012 deadline in sight, hedge fund advisers must now begin the paperwork process in earnest, and regulators are simultaneously gearing up their programs and personnel.  In the meantime, as registrations begin to trickle in, savvy investors can access the information that the SEC has already gathered through its Investment Adviser Public Disclosure search engine, located at http://www.adviserinfo.sec.gov/(S(ftfawpf0g2kg30ld33pph0xz))/IAPD/Content/IapdMain/iapd_SiteMap.aspx .  The website displays information on both state and SEC registered investment advisers.

Hedge funds fear dead hand of the box tickers

MONACO | Thu Jun 23, 2011 1:09pm EDT
(Reuters) - The entrepreneurial spirit that fueled the growth of the hedge fund industry could be killed off by investors worried about another Bernard Madoff-style fraud, said executives meeting in Monaco this week.
Managers left the GAIM conference, the annual get-together for the European industry, in more upbeat mood than last June after a year of client inflows, but they warned rigid demands by institutional investors threatened hedge funds' reputation as maverick investors.
"Institutions now are looking more for risk managers than investors, and that's a bad trend," said Oscar Schafer, managing partner of O S S Capital Management.
Executives said many big institutions, which helped hedge funds recover from the crisis of 2008, are now focusing their attentions on a checklist of attributes a hedge fund must have, such as a chief risk officer, a certain level of disclosure or a demonstrable investment process.
Not only can such demands distract managers from the task of managing money, but they may still not pinpoint the real risks and may mean that genuinely talented managers get starved of capital, managers warned.
"We have to encourage greater transparency ... But I think sometimes investors do go to the extreme, pushing 'check the box' style of risk management, which loses sight of where risks really do lie," said Coast Sullenger, managing director of Gaia Capital.
"Unfortunately, that type of approach does have a bad effect on entrepreneurial spirit, because it ties up managers to deal with those kinds of questions, and it's a big diversion."
MISSING THE NEXT SOROS
Institutional investors such as pension funds and endowments were among clients to back hedge funds during the credit crisis, when investors withdrew almost $300 billion net in 2008 and 2009, and now account for two-thirds or more of the $2 trillion industry.
But many are wary of a repeat of Bernard Madoff's fraud -- which delegates were reminded of when his yacht "Bull," up for sale at 3 million euros, was shown off at the conference this week.
While executives acknowledge that rigorous checks on a hedge fund's infrastructure and business model can help reassure investors and can help a start-up manager get their business in order, it can also go too far, they say.
"It's a game of protecting one's backside. A lot of employees are looking at those kind of personal risks, which would lead them not to invest in some particular companies."
Managers also worry that hedge funds could end up more like the traditional asset management industry and may not be able to take the same investment risks, meaning the most talented managers may never be spotted by investors.
"The last thing we want is to become a bureaucracy," said Bernard Oppetit, chairman of hedge fund firm Centaurus Capital. "It's a fact that the best investment decisions are the hardest to make, and they are almost never made by a committee."
"To tick every box on the part of investors is the wrong way to go. Of course they need to do due diligence, they need to kick the tires to make sure the infrastructure is robust ... but if this is all you do, you will not find ... the next George Soros."

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Sticking With It on China

Short sellers are deriding them. Regulators are investigating them. Some companies themselves have admitted accounting errors. What is Peter Siris doing with Chinese stocks? Buying.
Mr. Siris has long been one of the most public faces of the bull case for small and midsize Chinese companies listed on Western exchanges. He runs one of relatively few funds, and one of the biggest, devoted exclusively to such companies. He writes a newspaper column that has discussed China investing, highlighting some of the 70 stocks in his Guerrilla Capital Management LLC hedge fund.
In recent months, investors of all stripes have seen red in China: Hedge funds, mutual funds and private-equity firms all have taken their licks as shares have tumbled amid questions from regulators about the truthfulness of statements about their finances and operations.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has said it is investigating accounting and disclosure issues at some Chinese companies that trade on U.S. exchanges, and, last week, it formally warned investors on the risks of buying some Chinese stocks.
Hedge fund investor Peter Siris continues to invest heavily in China, despite recent negative news and financial declines. WSJ's Steve Eder reports. Photo: REUTERS/Brendan McDermid
Mr. Siris, 66 years old, is fast becoming a lone figure in the tug-of-war between China bulls and bears.
"It is hard to be more bullish than ever when every day you get attacked from all sides and every day you seem to lose money," says Mr. Siris, who launched his China fund in 2007. "But based on the individual companies and their fundamentals, I'm very bullish."
Mr. Siris is no novice to the China investment game. A Mandarin speaker, he first visited the country in the early 1970s, when he was helping manage his family's fashion-accessories manufacturing business after graduating from Harvard University's graduate business school. That job put him face to face with Chinese businessmen and led to him serving on a U.S. trade mission to China, he says. In the 1980s, he wrote a historical spy novel, "The Peking Mandate." While writing the book, he ran a small firm that assisted U.S. companies with establishing business lines in China.
Mr. Siris's background also includes a 15-year stint covering retail, apparel and consumer-products stocks for a few different Wall Street firms before he launched Guerrilla Capital in 1999. It was designed to bet on cheap stocks and against expensive ones. The name mirrors an investing handbook he authored in 1998 in which he portrays individual investors as up against better-armed professional investors.
His China-focused fund, Hua-Mei 21st Century Partners LP, has about $100 million in assets under management and annualized returns since its inception through April of about 22%, according to Mr. Siris. Hua-Mei means "China America" in Mandarin.
Recent weeks have been decidedly tough amid the drumbeat of bad news about China stocks. The fund, which includes some stocks whose trading has been halted, is down about 20% this year.
Andrew Left, who runs Citron Research, a website that publishes bearish reports on stocks, including some owned by Mr. Siris's fund, said in a posting last week that Mr. Siris "sounds like a bad stock promoter praying his stock doesn't go any lower."
He has never met Mr. Siris, but maintains, in an interview, that the hedge fund's recent dismal performance numbers "speak for themselves." Mr. Left adds: "Part of investing is knowing when to get out. He had the opportunity."
Mr. Siris, whose investing column runs in the New York Daily News, responds to the bears: "In my view, the short sellers are not really as on top of the companies as we are." His staff includes four analysts in China and two in New York who regularly visit companies to try to ascertain that they are what they say they are.
One of Mr. Siris's biggest investments is in Harbin Electric Inc. which, on May 27, issued a news release to "categorically deny" rumors its chief executive and top finance official had "gone missing." Instead, it said they were "at work and are fully performing their respective corporate duties." A board committee at the electric-motor manufacturer is evaluating an offer from the CEO to take the company private; the shares recently were down as much as 40% from a 52-week high.
Mr. Siris shakes his head at those rumors, saying he was in Harbin, China, meeting with the CEO the day he was supposedly absent. "I wondered if he disappeared before breakfast or after breakfast," Mr. Siris quipped.
To be sure, Mr. Siris says, there are frauds out there. He also acknowledges mistakes, saying a lesson learned over the years is that, if there's the "least bit" of questionable activity, he won't "hang around."
He recalls an occasion when the CEO of a Chinese firm twice missed meetings with him, prompting him to walk away from a possible investment. Mr. Siris says he also is betting against some two dozen Chinese stocks, including Longtop Financial Technologies Ltd. Longtop's chief financial officer and external auditor resigned in May amid an SEC inquiry over its accounting practices; the financial-technology firm has said a board committee hired a U.S. law firm to coordinate with the SEC in launching an independent investigation.
Clearly, some stock pickers are less convinced of the prospects for many China shares than is Mr. Siris. William Wells, founder of Memphis-based Pope Asset Management, who counts Mr. Siris as a friend, is trimming some of his positions in Chinese companies. Still, "with prices this low, I don't know that it makes sense to get out as long as what you have isn't fraudulent," he says. About one-third of the $600 million managed by Pope is in Chinese stocks.
To reassure Guerrilla Capital's investors, Mr. Siris invites them to travel with him to China. Scott Montgomery, of Spartanburg, S.C., joined a recent 10-day trip that included meetings with executives from about 30 Chinese companies.
"The Chinese have gotten a bad rap, but I don't think all of them are bad," says Mr. Montgomery. He is considering investing more with Guerrilla. His family has about 4% of its money invested with Guerrilla, half of it in the China fund.
Of Mr. Siris, he says, "I don't think he'll always be right, but he'll be right more than he's not."
Write to Steve Eder at steve.eder@wsj.com

Five Things Obama Can Do to Win Hedge Funds

By: John Carney
Senior Editor, CNBC.com

President Barack Obama is trying to win back Wall Street executives and hedge fund managers.

In the 2008 election campaign, Obama enjoyed broad support from Wall Street. Even many executives who usually support Republican candidates were backing Obama against John McCain.

But since then, Obama has turned off many financial industry executives by labeling them "fat cats"—and, perhaps more importantly, by failing to bring about a more robust economic recovery. The businesses of many of Wall Street's biggest companies depend, in large part, on a growing economy.

Obama's supporters have organized a series of meetings with financial executives to try to repair the relationship, according to the New York Times. In March, the Democratic National Committee held a meeting with two dozen Wall Street executives in the Blue Room of the White House. A month ago, Obama's campaign manager organized back-to-back meetings with Wall Street executives, culminating in a meeting at the home of hedge fund manager Marc Lasry. Also, Obama will "return to New York this month to dine with bankers, hedge fund executives and private equity investors at the Upper East Side restaurant Daniel," the Times reports.

The reason for all this courting is something many on Wall Street understand: money. Obama doesn't need their votes, he's sure to win New York and Connecticut, where many of the executives live. He needs their campaign cash.

So what can Obama do to win back the Wall Street fat cats whose bank accounts he hopes will finance his campaign?

1. Suck Up To The "Fat Cats." The top guys on Wall Street are mostly motivated by the desire for prestige. They're already so wealthy that money is often just a way of keeping track of who is "winning." They don't want to be bashed as "fat cats" or blamed for a recession they believe is mostly the result of an irrational mania for housing rather than financial misdeeds. They see themselves as charitable on the individual level, and performing an economically crucial service on the professional level. Most of them believe that bashing Wall Street is economically destructive.

In short, Wall Street guys are a lot like politicians. The key to winning them over is simply to reflect their own self-images back at them. They'll believe that "Obama gets it" when believe Obama likes them and their business. Give a speech somewhere praising the charitable efforts of the guys. Maybe work the Robin Hood Foundation into a speech about education policy.

2. Play Good Cop, Bad Cop With Hedge Funds. The most loathed political proposal in the hedge fund community is ending their ability to classify gains as "carried interest," forcing them to pay taxes on the gains as if it were ordinary income rather than capital gains. This proposal, which has been floating around for years, would dramatically raise the tax liability of hedge fund managers. Worse, it would undermine the very structure of hedge fund organization and compensation, which was largely built around the idea that the gains of investment decisions of hedge fund managers should be treated like just like the investment gains of everyone else—as capital gains.

But the only way Obama can make this issue into a winner is to make the tax change a credible threat. He has to hint that Democratic senators are likely to back the carried interest tax increase—and then point out his leadership is the only way to prevent this change. In short, Obama needs to be the "good cop" who will resist the tax-hiking Democratic senator bad cops.

3. Seduce The Youngsters. The way to win over a lot of the wealthiest supporters is to win over their staffers. This may seem counter-intuitive to a Washington insider. But here's how things work on Wall Street: Many of the executives take their social and political cues from their younger colleagues. So the staffers are the influencers. This goes back to the prestige thing: the top guys want to be considered to be "with in" and "in the know." Just look: at the recent hedge fund-heavy Robin Hood charity gala, they had Lady Gaga perform. You want a hedge fund guy on your side, win over the investor relations or sales people or portfolio managers. There are the people he trusts the most.

4. Listen and (Pretend to) Learn. Guys running investment banks and hedge funds are under the impression they are incredibly cognitively gifted. It's immensely frustrating to them that politicians often seem oblivious to their intellectual superiority. Of course, to many in politics this just makes the financial types seem like arrogant gas bags. Well, whatever. You're going to have to ignore that impression, and at least pretend you are very open to their ideas. Put a couple of their suggested guys on your "National Financial Council." Grab a retiring executive or two for your administration. You don't have to come up with any actual policies so long as you can credibly fake an interest in their policy ideas.

5. Come up with a credible economic policy. Okay. I kind of lied.

While listening will help, it would be even better to come up with a real economic policy. This is the big "duh." Right now no one on Wall Street is confident that the country's economy will grow well in the second half of this year or the first half of 2012. They don't have any clue what the Obama administration intends to do about that.

Proposing temporary measures, such as an employer-side payroll tax break, is considered a joke.

Bonus suggestion: Drop by a party or two in the Hamptons this summer.

Avoid the nightclubs or major charity events, which are pretty much unbearable in any year but promise to be even worse this year.

Instead, stick to the private parties with 100 or fewer invited guests. This will go a long way to making people forget all those nasty "fat cat" remarks. Pretty soon, they'll be purring along to your ego stroking. 

Asian Hedge Fund Awards 2011 Eurekahedge

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jake Shi <jakehku@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:06 PM
Subject: Asian Hedge Fund Awards 2011 Eurekahedge
To: jakehku.post@gmai.com


http://www.eurekahedge.com/news/11_hf_awards.asp

Man and machine suffer in tough May for hedge funds

LONDON (Reuters) – Hedge funds run by computers and star managers alike were hit by May’s choppy markets, as many funds were unable to recoup the heavy losses suffered in the commodities sell-off at the start of the month.

Computer-driven funds such as AHL and Aspect — which follow market trends but dislike sudden changes in market direction — fared badly, according to data group Lipper, as oil lost up to $13 a barrel at one point on May 5 and silver fell 12 percent on the same day.

But big-name investors such as Odey Asset Management’s Crispin Odey and Hermitage Capital’s Bill Browder also suffered losses in a month in which the average fund lost 1.4 percent, according to Hedge Fund Research, in line with the S&P 500′s fall.

Many funds were unable to recoup losses from the first week of May after they cut the size of their bets to limit further downside, industry executives say.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/03/us-lipper-hedgefunds-idUSTRE7523GO20110603

UPDATE 1-Principia joins ex-Goldman Sze with $750 mln Asia hedge fund

By Nishant Kumar



HONG KONG, May 27 (Reuters) - Principia Capital Advisors is set to launch a $750 million hedge fund later this summer, three sources familiar with the matter said, joining the ranks of former Goldman Sachs trader Morgan Sze's blockbuster launch last month.
Principia, named after a famous book by the 16th century French philosopher and writer Rene Descartes, is starting with commodity trading advisers or CTA, a hedge fund strategy betting on long-running trends in markets, credit and equity strategies, the sources said.
The sources identified Hang Hu as one of the top executives. Hu's background and Principia's backers could not be immediately ascertained.
Principia will have offices in Hong Kong and Beijing, two of the sources said, with equity strategy run from Hong Kong.
The launch will make Principia the second-biggest start-up in Asia this year after former Goldman Sachs trader Morgan Sze started with about more than $1 billion for his multi-strategy hedge fund.
"The wave of investor demand for Asian hedge fund product has coincided with an increase in the number of talented, "next-generation" regional managers, who adopt sophisticated investment strategies, risk management and infrastructure," said Frederick Ingham, head of hedge fund investments in the Asia-Pacific for money manager Neuberger Berman.
"This has led to an increase in significant and sizeable flows into the region's alternatives sector."
Hong Kong-based Sze, former head of Goldman's Principal Strategies group, launched Azentus Capital on April 1 and is set to grow the fund to more than $2 billion in the next few months, sources familiar with the matter said. [ID:nL4E7GH06W]
Interest in hedge funds has staged a comeback with the industry adding $93.9 billion in the first four months of the year or about $28 billion more than the corresponding period last year, according to data from Eurekahedge.
Asian hedge funds have witnessed twelve consecutive months of net positive asset flows after a recovery last year.
Asian hedge funds added $20 billion to their assets in 2010, backed by positive returns and accelerated flows in the second half of the year as investors returned to bet on the fast growing region.
Assets under hedge funds focused on the region rose to $152.3 billion in 2010, up from $132.2 billion a year earlier, a survey by fund tracker AsiaHedge showed.
About half of the asset growth was due to net inflows with 95 new hedge fund launches contributing $3.84 billion to the asset growth in 2010, a rise of 50 percent from a year earlier. Principia executives could not be reached for comment. Sources declined to be identified as they were not authorised to comment. (Reporting by Nishant Kumar; Editing by Jacqueline Wong)

http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=1076665401684856591

FrontPoint Partners expected retreat

Hedge fund firm FrontPoint Partners, which is a spin off unit from Morgan Stanley , is expected to retreat from its Hong Kong market in the third quarter at the earliest, market sources said.

Paulson $9bn hedge fund falls 6% in May


Paulson & Co, the world’s third-largest hedge fund, saw the value of its flagship fund drop close to 6 per cent in May, echoing losses across the industry.



The loss tops negative returns in the first quarter at the $37bn New York-based money manager, famed for the spectacular returns gained by shorting the US mortgage market in 2007, and will again raise questions over its portfolio’s volatility.



John Paulson, Paulson & Co’s founder, has maintained his bullish view on the US economy and equity markets, even though many of his peers have recently begun to lower their market exposure levels.



May’s loss means that in the year to date, the $9bn Paulson & Co Advantage Plus fund is down 7.6 per cent. The average hedge fund lost 1.39 per cent over the month according to preliminary data from Hedge Fund Research, with “event-driven” strategies such as that operated by Paulson & Co’s main fund down on average 0.62 per cent.



May was also a painful month for Mr Paulson’s other big investment call: gold.



The Paulson & Co Gold fund dropped 6.39 per cent in May, erasing much of its 8.5 per cent April gain. The fund is up 0.9 per cent in the year. Paulson & Co is the world’s largest non-sovereign gold investor.



Performance was better for the firm’s other funds. Its Credit fund was down 0.05 per cent for May, while the Recovery fund, which is geared to the prospects of the US economy, dropped 0.69 per cent. Paulson & Co declined to comment.



In the firm’s most recent correspondence with investors Mr Paulson said difficulties for US banks had been a particular drag on his portfolios but that he remained optimistic.



The US stock market could rally as much as 40 per cent from its first quarter level this year, he said.



Other hedge fund managers have become less bold. George Soros has cut his holdings of gold, leaving Mr Paulson as one of only a few top-tier managers with a significant position in the metal.



June is also shaping up to be a difficult month. Paulson & Co is the largest investor in Sino Forest, the Canadian-listed forestry group that has been accused by short seller Carson Block of fraud, charges that the company disputes.



The collapse in Sino Forest’s share price on Friday handed a $460m paper loss to Paulson & Co.
Mr Paulson is no stranger to volatile returns. Last year saw several months of significant performance swings but the firm ended 2010 with double-digit returns for all its funds.



The Advantage Plus fund returned 17 per cent in 2010. It returned 21.5 per cent in 2009, 37.6 per cent in 2008 and 158.5 per cent in 2007.

Monday, June 13, 2011

Ex-Primary Global Official Pleads Guilty in Insider Case

By AZAM AHMEDJ


une 7, 2011


A former executive at a research firm pleaded guilty on Tuesday to illegally passing secret information about public companies to hedge fund clients in exchange for money, representing another victory for the government in its pursuit of insider trading on Wall Street.
The executive, Don Ching Trang Chu, was the first defendant charged by federal prosecutors in the latest round of its insider trading investigation, which has focused on the expert network industry. Expert networks, which connect investors like hedge funds with executives at publicly traded companies for a fee, have come under intense scrutiny from regulators examining whether consultants have illegally disclosed nonpublic information to clients.
Mr. Chu’s arrest in November, which came on the heels of several raids at hedge funds, was the beginning of what has been a months-long effort to ferret out wrongdoing in the expert network industry. At the time, Mr. Chu, 57, was an executive at Primary Global Research specializing in the technology industry. He was described on the company’s Web site as a “bridge to Asia experts and data sources.”
Mr. Chu’s sentencing is set for Sept. 7 in Federal District Court in Manhattan. He faces up to 25 years in prison from his conviction for securities fraud. So far, the government has charged 13 people associated with expert network firms; including Mr. Chu, nine have pleaded guilty.


Mr. Chu read a brief statement in court late Tuesday, admitting that he connected hedge fund clients with consultants who disclosed important confidential information. “I understood that the P.G.R. clients intended to use that information in connection with the purchase or sale of securities by the hedge funds for which they worked,” he said.
In addition to ensnaring consultants and hedge fund managers, the investigation has brought down firms as well. Several hedge funds, including Level Global Investors, shut down in the wake of federal raids after investors demanded their money back. Primary Global has since shuttered its office, although a spokesman has said the firm has not closed down.
The investigation has also ensnared several hedge fund managers as the focus has shifted from the expert networks to their hedge fund clients. A number of managers have already pleaded guilty, including two former employees of the prominent hedge fund SAC Capital Advisors. One of those employees, Noah Freeman, testified this week as a government witness at the trial of Winifred Jiau, another former employee of Primary Global, who was charged with passing illegal tips to a number of investors, including Mr. Freeman.
Mr. Chu was accused of arranging to pass along private information about such companies as Broadcom and Atheros to his hedge fund clients, who used the illicit tips to make money. Among those clients was Richard C.B. Lee, another former employee of SAC and the founder of Spherix Capital, a California-based hedge fund, who began cooperating with authorities in their investigation in 2009.
In the summer of 2009, Mr. Chu arranged a call between Mr. Lee and an employee of Advanced Micro Devices. During the call, the executive dished up a range of financial data ahead of the company’s earnings, including revenue and gross margin numbers.
The following month, in August, Mr. Lee and Mr. Chu met in person. Mr. Lee told him that the numbers that the technology company employee had given him were “spot on” and wondered whether Mr. Chu was ever “nervous,” according to the original complaint filed against Mr. Chu. Later, Mr. Chu admitted that he was and said he did not like conducting business in the United States. He said that in Asia regulators “can’t do too much,” the complaint says.


http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/06/07/ex-primary-global-official-pleads-guilty-in-insider-case/

Eisman to Leave FrontPoint Partners

By AZAM AHMED

June 8, 2011, 7:12 pm

Steve Eisman, the colorful hedge fund manager who made a fortune betting against the subprime mortgage market, is leaving FrontPoint Partners, according to people familiar with the matter.

His departure is another blow for the hedge fund firm, which came under pressure last year amid an insider trading scandal. The controversy prompted investors to pull billions of dollars from FrontPoint, a loss of capital that led the firm to close most of its funds last month.

Speculation about of Mr. Eisman’s pending departure began circulating earlier this year. A source close to Mr. Eisman said he was disappointed that his fund had experienced heavy redemption requests as a result of the scandal, despite the fact that his funds were completely unrelated to it. Two of Mr. Eisman’s three funds at FrontPoint had experienced nearly a half billion dollars in redemption requests at the time.

While the firm has not been accused of wrongdoing, a former FrontPoint portfolio manager, Joseph Skowron, was charged by federal authorities in April. Mr. Skowron is accused of paying for inside tips about a clinical drug trial, information that helped his fund avoid $30 million in losses.

AR Magazine previously reported on Mr. Eisman’s planned departure.

Mr. Eisman is the most prominent manager at FrontPoint, thanks in large part to a leading role he played in “The Big Short,” Michael Lewis’s best-selling book about the financial crisis.
It is unclear what Mr. Eisman will do next. But a person close to him says he eventually plans to start a new fund.

FrontPoint has been devastated by the insider trading mess. Last month, the firm said it planned to close its flagship fund, which accounted for the bulk of the firm’s assets. It will retain four strategies: the quant macro fund, strategic credit fund, Rockbay fund and a direct lending fund.

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/06/08/steve-eisman-to-leave-frontpoint/

Increased Reporting by Hedge Funds to Regulators Coming Soon

Judy Gross

Jun. 2 2011 - 7:55 am

The Securities and Exchange Commission, in conjunction with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, has proposed a new “Form PF” reporting requirement, which, if implemented as proposed, represents a substantial increase in the amount of information required to be reported in to these regulators by hedge funds.

Form PF is a statutory mandate stemming from the Dodd-Frank Act’s goal of promoting the financial stability of the US by supervising non-bank financial companies that may pose systemic risks. The information gathered from the Form PF will be shared with the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC). The SEC believes the Form PF is beneficial not only in monitoring systemic risks, but also in providing information that will enhance the SEC’s ability to formulate regulatory policies. The FSOC will use the data obtained from the Form PF to gain a broad view of the financial system and to gauge interconnectedness of financial players.

All SEC or CFTC registered investment advisers to private funds must file a Form PF. There are two types of proposed filers of the Form PF – those advisers with assets over $1billion, and those under $1billion.The under $1b group files annually, the over $1b group, quarterly. The annual filers have an abbreviated form, while the larger ones have an extended version to complete. Broadly speaking, the information requested falls into the categories of: amount of assets under management, use of leverage, counterparty credit risk exposure, and trading and investment positions/performance for each fund. The extended form includes additional information involving stress testing and exposure analyses.

We believe that the Form PF will present significant challenges to hedge funds in three areas:
1. Time/Cost Burden: The proposed rule estimates that the burden for the smaller advisers will be 10 hours to prepare an initial report, and 3 hours for each subsequent report. The estimated burden for the larger advisers is 75 hours for the initial report, and 35 hours for each subsequent quarterly report. The SEC notes that it believes some or all reporting will be outsourced, or, if not, will require both compliance and IT programmers to develop internal reporting systems. We believe that the time and cost burden may be even more significant than estimated by the SEC and that advisers need to begin to focus now on how they will address actually prepare the report.

2. Timetable: The implementation dates for the first filing are relatively soon. The first filing date may be as soon as the first quarter of 2012, although an extension of this date seems likely at this point . The quarterly filers must file thereafter within 15 days of each quarter end. We believe that if this timetable is adopted as proposed, it is offering an extremely small window for quarterly filers, who will need to have expert systems in place very soon in order to fulfill these obligations.

3. Confidentiality: The proposal states that all information collected in Form PF will not be made public, although the information collected may be shared in an enforcement action or with Congress (upon agreement of confidentiality). The SEC may also share the information with other government agencies or SRO’s, most particularly the FSOC. While seemingly reasonable, we are concerned that the collected information, which is the cornerstone of a hedge fund’s business, may be made, through circuitous sharing within the government and Congress, unintentionally available publicly.

The proposed Form PF reporting regulation is available at http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2011/ia-3145.pdf.

http://blogs.forbes.com/judygross/2011/06/02/increased-reporting-by-hedge-funds-to-regulators-coming-soon/